So you have seen the above policy change in writing? I have not, so can you please post a link to the source of that information?
Just read the post and no there hasn't been anything from Kia in writing, other than denying coverage for excessive oil consumption based on owners experiences Over on the Kia site, there have been 3 so far that have been denied in the last couple of weeks.
One, they supposedly took an oil sample and told the owner that worn rings were the cause of the oil consumption and based on that investigation, the engine wouldn't be replaced and that if the engine does seize in the future, it wouldn't be covered as the rings would be the cause.
Two others using oil in the qt p/ 300-400 mile range were denied as that excessive oil consumption was not part of the "settlement". What a company, crappy engines and give some double talk to the gullible owners and send them on their way. Not knocking the owners, but the scum-balls at stealership/Kia give lip service and the owners don't know how to reply.
I know the 4 dealerships I've dealt with were far from reputable as they think everyone that comes into for service are idiots. When I had the engine replaced, 172,000 miles '11 2.0T for oil consumption (engine operated perfectly), had a few problems and the misfit writers at the stealership ended up with their tail between their legs. With 25 dealerships in the family, I called the daughter and it was corrected quickly.
My advice was not to change the oil, but get an oil sample from the current oil in the vehicle, then go to the dealership. At least this way one would know what metallic substance, if any, would be in the oil. I know it would be a little messy taking the sample, but one could remove the drain plug and install back in quickly, or clean the filter perfectly, loosen and catch the oil, but either way can't have any contamination.in the sample.
This is only three that posted on the Forum so would assume there's more, so best advice is to have the engine seize.