Hyundai Forums banner

Motor Trend achieves 40 mpg

2.4K views 10 replies 11 participants last post by  someguy  
#1 ·
A few days ago Motor Trend posted their 5th update of their longtime Elantra tester. The writer confessed disappointment with the Elantra's fuel economy during one long California trip. He averaged 28.6 mpg over 7 tanks. He admitted that he was driving quite fast. The display indicated an average speed of 65 mph during the trip which included city driving.

His post concludes with this:
A few weeks later, I would take the Elantra on another trip up to Redding and back in an attempt to hit the elusive 40 mpg. I knew I had to drive it in the most mind-numbingly painful way possible, as anything else would result in a low-to-mid-30 mpg figure at best. My test track would be I-5 south running from Redding, Calif. all the way to Los Angeles. I'd top off in Redding, and then hypermile my way home.

I didn't want to be a danger to myself or others, however, so the decision was made to travel at exactly the posted speed limit -- not faster, not slower -- and that I wouldn't be drafting big rigs. Mercifully, the limit was 70 mph for most of the drive. I was going to do it right -- not without gimmicks, but just without most of them. Cruise control would be on the whole entire time, the whole trip would be driven without the use of air conditioning, and the Elantra's "Eco" mode would be left on.

To increase the odds of hitting the big 4-0, I left Redding in the late afternoon to minimize the risk of traffic and to cut down on the time I'd spend in 80 degree heat with no A/C. As planned, I topped off in Redding, rolled the windows up, made sure the "Eco" light was on, and gingerly accelerated towards the freeway.

Once on the slab, I set the cruise control at the posted speed limit, which at that point was 55 mph. After a few miles, it went up to 65 mph and as I gently accelerated, the Elantra downshifted to the detriment of fuel economy. When the limit went up again to 70 mph a few more miles later, I switched into manual mode to make sure it stayed in sixth. The same "gentle throttle in sixth" approach would be taken for each passing maneuver as well.

At this point, all I could do was drive until I ran out of gas or spontaneously combusted due to boredom. (Dozens of people spontaneously combust each year. It's just not really widely reported.) In an effort to combat boredom, I spent my seven hours flipping through the satellite radio stations and watching the Elantra's average fuel economy meter. With around three-quarters of a tank left, the numbers peaked at 37.6 mpg and then slowly fell to 37.0 mpg. With about a half tank left, the number started dropping a lot more rapidly. By the time I stopped for gas 416.6 miles later with an estimated 30 miles of range left, the readout read 35.8 mpg.

Needless to say I was disappointed. With the clock rapidly approaching midnight and some 120 miles left before I was home, I accepted defeat. As it turns out, all was not lost. When I did the math the next morning, it turned out that on my miserable, awful, terribly boring fuel economy run, I used 10.473 gallons of gas while traveling 416.6 miles. Using simple divison, that provides a fuel economy figure of 39.77 mpg, which of course rounds up to 40 mpg!. Freakin' A.
 
#2 ·
The highly graded 4100+ ft elevation of the Tejon Pass definitely played havoc on the mpg as well but the Elantra still made it out quite well.
 
#4 ·
I don't turn my a/c off or drive the speed limit. I drive as I have all my life (74). Sometimes I get 32mpg and other times I get 35mpg. In town around 28-29mpg. I found out that everyone drives different and very few people will attain the mpg that Hyundai says you get. I enjoy my car and figure as long as I do, that is all that matters. When you have to not do this or do something to get the mpg that Hyundai says you get, you spoil your enjoyment of driving. The dude who test and got almost 40mpg had to do w/o a/c, that ain't my bag. Drive your car and enjoy it. If you have a great experience with it, you will buy another one when you get ready to buy, if not you buy another brand. just my opinion.
 
#6 · (Edited)
I'll be thrilled if I averaged 32 on the highway to be honest. I'm driving a 2011 Kia soul and the gas mileage is not very good but hey, it's a box and wind is NOT my friend.

I can't wait to get this car or should I say the GT version.

Highway I usually get 8.5-9 l/100km (26 MPG) and city driving is around 10.5 l/100 km (22.4 MPG).
 
#8 ·
Motor Trend is in business to sell magazines, not to "test" cars. Their road tests are instrumented and reasonably accurate, but the supporting article rarely correlates with actual numbers, and the text is loaded with silly adjectives and opinions. Their final "first place" pick in any given test is not always the car that "won" according to the numbers but rather the one they liked better.

They can't sell magazines by encouraging drivers to stay safe and legal. They sell magazines by creating tortured fantasies of barreling along Mulholland at double the posted speed limit in a car whose insurance premium exceeds the annual income of a significant portion of their readership. So it is not surprising to see them describe driving safely and legally as boring and onerous - it legitimizes their mind-numbing hyperbole on the remaining pages of the magazine.

I always laugh at their misuse of the verb "hypermile". The definition of hypermiling is - beating the EPA estimates in whatever you're driving. Employing "hypermiling techniques", which are changes in driving methods that minimize energy waste, will all but guarantee surpassing EPA estimates to varying degrees. To "hypermile your way home" is to drive the distance while achieving fuel economy that exceeds the value posted by the EPA. The unfortunate journalist failed to do this and then complained about it. Metaphorically speaking, this is like eating four boxes of Twinkies and then complaining about weight gain.

Most cars will beat their EPA highway estimate when driven safely and legally, with some doing better than others at "beating the EPA". A recent test I conducted and then documented in an article titled "A Pair of (40mpg) Kings" demonstrated that the Elantra can deliver roughly 45mpg with the cruise set at 65 - the legal limit - on freeways. Even several miles in a light-to-light crawl on the Las Vegas strip didn't drag the final average below 45mpg. A/C was used as needed when in Death Valley, and the tires were at the 32psi minimum to make sure the car was sabotaged as much as possible. And it still beat its EPA highway estimate. What happened in the case of the M/T driver? One clue is the "case of Red Bull" they admitted to toting along. These are Type-A personalities who will not hit the EPA numbers in any car unless they're stuck in light traffic that forces them to drive safely and with a fairly steady throttle.

A few days ago, I got some seat time in a 2012 Sonata Hybrid - another car that plumbium-shoed drivers claim is never able to deliver on its EPA ratings. Driving on LI at the tail end of the afternoon drive time, in a fairly even mix of highway - both stop-n-go and open road - and light-to-light on Route 24, the average MPG varied between 46 and 49mpg. And that included keeping up with traffic on the highways, and not rerouting around known traffic snarls. The cars can do it, and I haven't yet driven a car that can't hit its EPA highway numbers without any major changes in driving. And my "students" who have gone for a drive with me to learn the methods have also gone on to beat the EPA in their cars.

Take the M/T articles for what they are - entertainment. They are about as relevant in daily driving as "Glee" is in day-to-day education is in a typical high school.