Hyundai Forums banner

N-Line JB4: Before and After Dyno Thread

35K views 37 replies 18 participants last post by  Turbo6TA  
#1 ·
Hello Y'all,

I have a JB4 coming in on Thursday and coincidentally I learned of a local Dyno day that was coming this Saturday. I decided to take the opportunity to do a before and after at the same location to get some comparisons of the baseline performance and then with the MAP2 of the JB4. I have a SXTH Intake and a custom 3" Exhaust. With still having a factory throttle body and factory down pipe, I do not think they would make any real major improvements. Maybe a horsepower or two at most.

The car Dyno'd at 294whp and 295wtq. Quite impressive from the factory. Important to note I have 17,800 miles on the car and it has only seen 93 octane. This baseline was all Shell 93. Those are the circumstances of mods and fuel.

Dyno is a DynoJet 224X

Before:
Link to video: Sonata N-Line Dyno Run - Baseline (294whp & 295wtq) - YouTube

Image


After: TBD
 
#5 ·
Burger the company that makes the JB4 is 20 miles from me and my self and others in the area have used their tuners on cars for a while.

On your 1.6T if you can only get 91 octane you will probably only be able to use "MAP 1" on the JB4. You will still get a performance improvement but not nearly as much as if you can use "MAP2", higher or a custom tune
 
#12 ·
Amazing! With an approximate 20% Automatic trans loss that is about 400 crank HP!! Let me know if you can keep traction from a launch! I am trying to see if I can get it to not spin with launch control. I need to stiffen the rear shocks to reduce weight transfer on launch. If this thing can hook from a dig it will be a rocket!
 
#15 ·
Hi Guys, Just FYI for all of you using these tuner kits and doing other mods....

Our Standard N Lines have 311 lbft torque = 43.54 kgf m. According to a Hyundai engine and transmission tech info site our 8speed Wet DCT can handle UP TO 53 kgf∙m.= 378 lbft. torque!!! 1 lbft = 0.14 kgf m (ie Kg Force Metres) Also The Wet 8DCT’s power transmission efficiency is 93.8%. Hope that helps and saves anyone trying to get MORE POWER/TORQUE from over stressing and damaging their very expensive to replace DCT !!
 
#16 ·
I am gonna sound real dumb here but I am gonna ask anyway...

According to the pre mod Dyno readings from the first post, the car has 294 hp at the wheels and 295 torque at the wheels. Does this mean the car actually has 313 hp and the crank and about the same torque?


Sent from somewhere you've never been.
 
#17 ·
Since our cars are stock at 290 HP and 311 lbft Torque I think you will find the extra power /torque he has is because he has intake and exhaust mods already fitted as per his comments, quoted from the 1st post-

"I have a SXTH Intake and a custom 3" Exhaust. With still having a factory throttle body and factory down pipe, I do not think they would make any real major improvements. Maybe a horsepower or two at most.

The car Dyno'd at 294whp and 295wtq. Quite impressive from the factory. Important to note I have 17,800 miles on the car and it has only seen 93 octane. This baseline was all Shell 93. Those are the circumstances of mods and fuel."
 
#18 · (Edited)
On my side, I have the JB4 on my N-line since last year. I used it in map1 with 91 oct and in map2 with 93 oct a couple weeks without any issue. As soon as I began to use map3, I got some dct slipping isues in pair gears. I sent all the logs to the Burger guys and at the end, the answer was to stay in map1. So, that tuner do some amazing things on the Sonata but the dct trans seem to be really close to is maximum torque capacity.
 
#24 ·
At one point I drove a 2013 Genesis Coupe with the 3.8 v6. I was reading this post again and it made me think to go find the window sticker from the Genesis. And although not a big hp Difference the window sticker (attached) shows 344 hp running regular and 348 running premium so maybe we do get a few more hp from running higher octane? Thoughts?
Image
 
#33 · (Edited)
60° Elbow, Silicone, 2.25” ID
$ 13.14

Amazon.com

Intercooler Pipe, T6061 Brushed Aluminum, 2.0” OD
$ 20.11

Amazon.com

T-Bolt Clamp, Stainless, 2.25” (2 Clamps Needed - for both ends of the 60 degree elbow)
$ 5.31

2.25" T-BOLT CLAMP STAINLESS STEEL HOSE TURBO INTAKE INTERCOOLER 63-70MM 2PCS | eBay

T-Bolt Clamp, Stainless, 2.00” (1 Clamp Needed - for the end of the pipe that attaches to the rubber hose leading into the intercooler)
$ 4.07
2" T-BOLT CLAMP 57-65MM SILICONE STAINLESS STEEL HOSE TURBO INTAKE INTERCOOLER | eBay

Total: $ 42.63

..........................................................

Note) The aluminum intercooler pipe will need to be shortened slightly to 10” in total length. The easiest way I found to shorten this pipe is using an electric ‘cut-off wheel’. Then smooth the cut edge with a rounded file. (See photo below)

Image


Note) One problem that I encountered is that the inside diameter of the elbow is 2.25" and the outside diameter of the aluminum pipe is just slightly more than 2" .. so the fit is just too loose between the 2 parts.

The fix is to get a 1" wide piece of 1/16" thick rubber sheet and cut it in length so it fits perfectly around the end of the aluminum pipe. Once it is wrapped around the end of the pipe, wrap a long piece of masking tape tightly around the rubber strip to hold it together on to the pipe. Then when the pipe is inserted into the end of the silicone elbow, it won't be very loose at all. Then tighten the 2.25" T-bolt clamp good and tight
 
#36 · (Edited)
I guess you could call it the 'hot pipe' ... It's the pressurized air pipe that goes between the turbocharger compressor and into the top of the intercooler. (see the photo in post #29).

It has nothing to do with the turbocharger's compressor inlet pipe that routes air from the intake air filter into the comprssor of the turbocharger (that is non-pressurized air).