Joined
·
155 Posts
This may be common knowledge to some, but I thought I'd share what I've learned about dealerships and warranties.
I had a miserable 30 minute chat with Hyundai Consumer Affairs after my Dealership decided that I live in a 'severe usage' area because my town has "a great deal of stoplights" and the salt / ice issue blablabla. They wanted to charge $320 about for a transmission flush and a radiator fluid flush for 30k miles. I asked if this was for every 30k and they said yep. So that's about $960 over the course of my warranty. I know dealerships are not great, but up until this point I had zero problems with them.
HCA states that the dealership is the ultimate authority on warranties. They also claim that the book is a guideline and "they know best". I pointed out that the book never even mentions severe usage for the radiator fluid, and that the transfer case fluid (awd) needs to be replaced at 30k if i'm in a sever usage area. Why didn't they recommend that too? Well they called the dealer while I was on hold and along with the stop lights crap they also informed me that they didn't think that they should have to replace the transfer case fluid every 30k even though the manual says so. So they get to have their cake and eat it too. lovely.
So then I said.. isn't there a potential conflict of interest here? If I choose to skip out on their recommendations and then have them deny me warranty when something breaks? THE HCA person said that they couldn't comment on that statement.
After that I asked. OK hypothetical question.. Say that I purchased my santa fe new, and never went to the dealership for repairs. I changed the oil myself and went to the trusty mechanic for the suggested maintenance and skip out on the severe usage because I didn't feel I lived in that area. What would happen if something broke and I went to the dealership? HCA stated that I'd be bound by the same restrictions, and it would be my responsibility to find out whether or not I was in a severe usage area.
So to sum things up, Dealership gets to pick things at random that need to be fixed. They skip some things, perhaps because the $$ to labor ratio is too low. They can and will refuse warranty at their discretion, and if you turn down suggested fixes, they very well may turn down warranty claims.
I talked to another Hyundai owner, and they suggested telling the dealership to pound sand, and try a few others in his area that should be more lenient. I'm not sure what they plan on saying, but at 35K miles and no signs of transmission failure, I'm taking a calculated risk of avoiding the dealership premiums and voiding my warranty.. at least for the transmission. I do plan on changing the fluid at 60k, but it won't be enough for the current dealership that I go to.
** EDIT **
Dear mods.. I was not trying to put any profanity in my subject line.. Honest Abe! I was referring to H - E double-hockey stick in the literal sense. I was damning my warranty as I felt that it had sinned and therefore belonged in the underworld... left to burn for all eternity with my letter from santa and BP stocks.
I had a miserable 30 minute chat with Hyundai Consumer Affairs after my Dealership decided that I live in a 'severe usage' area because my town has "a great deal of stoplights" and the salt / ice issue blablabla. They wanted to charge $320 about for a transmission flush and a radiator fluid flush for 30k miles. I asked if this was for every 30k and they said yep. So that's about $960 over the course of my warranty. I know dealerships are not great, but up until this point I had zero problems with them.
HCA states that the dealership is the ultimate authority on warranties. They also claim that the book is a guideline and "they know best". I pointed out that the book never even mentions severe usage for the radiator fluid, and that the transfer case fluid (awd) needs to be replaced at 30k if i'm in a sever usage area. Why didn't they recommend that too? Well they called the dealer while I was on hold and along with the stop lights crap they also informed me that they didn't think that they should have to replace the transfer case fluid every 30k even though the manual says so. So they get to have their cake and eat it too. lovely.
So then I said.. isn't there a potential conflict of interest here? If I choose to skip out on their recommendations and then have them deny me warranty when something breaks? THE HCA person said that they couldn't comment on that statement.
After that I asked. OK hypothetical question.. Say that I purchased my santa fe new, and never went to the dealership for repairs. I changed the oil myself and went to the trusty mechanic for the suggested maintenance and skip out on the severe usage because I didn't feel I lived in that area. What would happen if something broke and I went to the dealership? HCA stated that I'd be bound by the same restrictions, and it would be my responsibility to find out whether or not I was in a severe usage area.
So to sum things up, Dealership gets to pick things at random that need to be fixed. They skip some things, perhaps because the $$ to labor ratio is too low. They can and will refuse warranty at their discretion, and if you turn down suggested fixes, they very well may turn down warranty claims.
I talked to another Hyundai owner, and they suggested telling the dealership to pound sand, and try a few others in his area that should be more lenient. I'm not sure what they plan on saying, but at 35K miles and no signs of transmission failure, I'm taking a calculated risk of avoiding the dealership premiums and voiding my warranty.. at least for the transmission. I do plan on changing the fluid at 60k, but it won't be enough for the current dealership that I go to.
** EDIT **
Dear mods.. I was not trying to put any profanity in my subject line.. Honest Abe! I was referring to H - E double-hockey stick in the literal sense. I was damning my warranty as I felt that it had sinned and therefore belonged in the underworld... left to burn for all eternity with my letter from santa and BP stocks.