Do you like Hyundai-Forums.com? Link to us and help spread the word about our forum. Thanks!
Fram Oil Filters!? Not So Good !? |
|
|
|
|
Jun 24 2006, 08:58 AM
|

Senior
  
Group: Members
Posts: 302
Joined: 2-August 05
Member No.: 9,863
Status: 
Location: Canada
Drives: 1969 Honda CB 750 four

|
QUOTE(jaaribear @ Jun 13 2006, 06:52 PM) ive always used fram, c tire filters, and have never had any problems nor have i ever seen or heard of any caused by a fram filter... i think its just a false rumor. my father years ago used to say something about penzoil motor oil too though i cannot remmeber what ...
Good for you :clap: just look at the picture in the first post and you'll see why you are buying crap after that read the links and you'll know for sure you are paying for crap :thumbsup: and BTW a rumor is just words this is a fact I have material proof right here on my desk
This post has been edited by lightningTib: Jun 24 2006, 09:03 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 18 2008, 11:32 AM
|
Member

Group: Members
Posts: 39
Joined: 12-February 08
Member No.: 41,063
Status: 
Location: upstate NY
Drives: '08 Sonata Ltd 3.3

|
Most oil filters have filter elements made of paper and are effective down to about 40 microns. The advanced filters have composite elements made of paper, cellulose, and fiberglass, and are effective down to 15 microns or less. Typically these advanced filters also have more surface area on their elements, and therefore more capacity. To put this into perspective, 25 microns is about 1 thousandth of an inch. Below are pics of a paper element and a synthethic element expanded 50 times. In these pictures, a 30 micron particle would be about this big: o In your motor, most parts like pistons, bearings, and bushings are set up with a clearance of 1 thousandth of an inch, so to the moving lubricated parts a 25 micron particle is as big as the oil film, and will scratch both surfaces. We don't want particulate in our engines 25 microns or bigger. Some companies claim that even particles as small as 1 to 5 microns cause premature engine wear, but I don't find the evidence on this topic to be compelling, either for or against. Anyway, you can see now that standard paper filters are marginal. The paper filters let through about 10 to 20 times as much 25 micron stuff as the synthetic filters do, and about 5 to 10 times as much 15 micron stuff. It's not enough to ask a company to what size particle their filter is effective. Imagine a screen door with some oil on it. Obviously something the size of a golf ball or fly is simply not getting through. However, even particles which are a tenth the size of the holes sometimes don't get through - spray your screen door with a garden hose and see what comes off. Oil filters are similar, except the holes are random in size, not perfectly regular like a screen door. So, company A says "Our filters are effective down to 7 microns." What does this mean? If "effective" means "we catch 15%," well, I'm not impressed. You need an efficiency number along with the size number before you can really think you know something. No filter is 100% effective - this would require either very regular holes, which are currently impossible to mass produce, or very small holes on average, which would block too much oil flow. Some filters, however, ARE clearly better than others. For example, Purolator makes filters in three qualities, standard, premium, and Pure One. Purolator states that their premium filters capture 97.8% @ 30 microns and 85.2% @ 20 microns. These numbers are typical of a normal paper element oil filter. The Purolator Pure One filters capture 99.8% @ 30 microns and 99.2% @ 20 microns. This means the Premium filter is letting through eleven times as many 30 micron particles as the Pure One, and eighteen times as many 20 micron particles. Clearly, the Pure One filter is doing a considerably better job of cleaning the oil than the premium filter. The way the Pure One achieves this filtering efficiency is by combining three different types of materials in their filter: paper like everyone else to catch the big stuff, and cellulose and fiberglass fibers to fill in the "large" holes in the paper with their much finer fibers. Filters like this are now made by Purolator, Hastings (marketed as AMS), and Champion (marketed as Mobil 1 and Bosch). Accordingly, the best oil filters are the Purolator Pure One, Mobil-1, AMSOil, and Bosch. If you use one of these filters with one of the commercial synthetic oils, IMO you have the best protection money can buy. Champion says the Bosch is a 15 micron filter, and the Mobil-1 is a 10 micron filter but gives no efficiency numbers. AMS claims their filter is effective to "7 to 10 microns," but again without any efficiency number. SAE tests would tend to indicate that the Purolator has a slight advantage in filtering over the other filters named here. Additionally, the Mobil-1 (M1-110) has excellent filter media but only 60 sq. in. surface area (less than a stock filter), vs. PureOne (PL14610) with 110 sq.in. The important thing is, all of these filters have performance at 30 microns which is far superior to a paper only filter, and all of these filters have performance at 20 microns which is also far superior to a paper filter. So, bottom line, these filters will clean your oil far better than a paper-only filter. Be aware too, all filters have to undergo SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) tests to prove that they meet the engine manufacturer's requirements. The SAE J806 test uses a single-pass test, checking for contaminant holding capacity, size of contaminant particles trapped, and ability to maintain clean oil. As an amendment of the J806 test, the multi-pass test also looks for filter life in hours, contaminant capacity in grams, and efficiency based on weight. The efficiency of the filter is determined only by weight through gravimetric measurement of the filtered test liquid. Typical numbers for paper filter elements are 85% (single pass) and 80% (multi-pass). A new test, the SAE J1858, provides both particle counting and gravimetric measurement to measure filter capacity and efficiency. Actual counts of contaminant particles by size are obtained every 10 minutes, both upstream (before the filter) and downstream (after the filter), for evaluation. From this data filtration ratio and efficiency for each contaminant particle size can be determined as well as dust capacity and pressure loss as a function of time. Typical numbers for paper element filters are 40% at 10 microns, 60% at 20 microns, 93% at 30 microns, and 97% at 40 microns. This means a paper filter passes about 25 times as many 30 micron particles as a Pure One. I would love to see these numbers for the various available filters, but no filter manufacturers release them. Hmm, wonder why???
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 18 2008, 12:17 PM
|
Member

Group: Members
Posts: 39
Joined: 12-February 08
Member No.: 41,063
Status: 
Location: upstate NY
Drives: '08 Sonata Ltd 3.3

|
The following info (and that in my previous post) was gleaned from researching filters for my G35 6mt sedan. Obviously, you will need to cross the specific filter number for your application, however, I thought sharing the info may be helpful. This is what happens to a 'Fram-style' filter with cardboard end caps, with only slight squeeze between thumb and forefinger... Obviously, not an issue with the PureOne which utilizes metal end caps... Also, be very aware the Anti-Drain Back Valve PSI ratings on any oil filter you use must be as close as possible to OEM filter specs. For example, while both filters cross to my engine, the PureOne is rated 17psi vs. the M-110 at 25psi. OEM is 14psi and, since I'm using synth oil in a cold climate, I the lower psi of the PureOne is more appropriate for my application. Note that anti-drain back valves are not all alike. Many oil filter brands have a really cheap piece of plastic that doesn't seal very well at all. Below is a picture of the Pure-One and the Mobil-1 anti-drainback valves. Both filters use the superior silicon rubber, however, the Pure-One has a larger core and a convex shaped mating surface to guarantee an excellent fit. The Mobil-1 has a flat seal and a flat mating surface which do not inspire the same confidence. The Mobil-1 anti-drainback valve isn't bad, it's clearly superior to that of most other filters.. The Purolators use superior media and are good, well made filters IMHO. However, notice the metal centertube does not extend the entire length of the filter. Like a cardboard end cap, unsupported folded media must take enough psi to open the bypass or failure will occur. While some may consider this cause for concern, I would note that the PureOne media is heavily epoxied at both ends and also appears to have some sort of coating on the media which acts a stiffener. I stuck a small metal rod into the opening and put what I feel is a fairly heavy amount of force on the center tube attempting to dislodge it, but it did not move. In the end, I found (10) filters 'crossed' to my OEM filter #. Applying the high construction and filter media standards outlined above then eliminating all without silicone rubber ADBVs, I found only (3) filters for my G35 with bypass PSI the same as the OEM filter specs: - Wix 51356 - NAPA Gold 21356 - Purolator L14610 Hope that helps, cheers.
This post has been edited by dholly: Feb 18 2008, 12:41 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 18 2008, 12:37 PM
|
Veteran
    
Group: Members
Posts: 1,219
Joined: 29-May 05
Member No.: 7,789
Status: 
Location: Cyberspace
Drives: Nautical Blue 2006 Tucson 2.7L V6

|
QUOTE(dholly @ Feb 18 2008, 11:32 AM) Most oil filters have filter elements made of paper and are effective down to about 40 microns. The advanced filters have composite elements made of paper, cellulose, and fiberglass, and are effective down to 15 microns or less. Typically these advanced filters also have more surface area on their elements, and therefore more capacity. To put this into perspective, 25 microns is about 1 thousandth of an inch. Below are pics of a paper element and a synthethic element expanded 50 times. In these pictures, a 30 micron particle would be about this big: o
<SNIP>
A new test, the SAE J1858, provides both particle counting and gravimetric measurement to measure filter capacity and efficiency. Actual counts of contaminant particles by size are obtained every 10 minutes, both upstream (before the filter) and downstream (after the filter), for evaluation. From this data filtration ratio and efficiency for each contaminant particle size can be determined as well as dust capacity and pressure loss as a function of time. Typical numbers for paper element filters are 40% at 10 microns, 60% at 20 microns, 93% at 30 microns, and 97% at 40 microns. This means a paper filter passes about 25 times as many 30 micron particles as a Pure One. I would love to see these numbers for the various available filters, but no filter manufacturers release them. Hmm, wonder why??? [right][snapback]137903[/snapback][/right]
QUOTE(dholly @ Feb 18 2008, 12:17 PM) The following info (and that in my previous post) was gleaned from researching filters for my G35 6mt sedan. Obviously, you will need to cross the specific filter number for your application, however, I thought sharing the info may be helpful.
This is what happens to a 'Fram-style' filter with cardboard end caps, with only slight squeeze between thumb and forefinger...
Obviously, not going to be an issue with filters utilizing metal end caps...
Here is a cutaway of the PureOne...
[right][snapback]137914[/snapback][/right]
Thanks for plagiarizing Mark Lawrence's website as your own research. The text is verbatim and even includes the same pictures: http://www.calsci.com/motorcycleinfo/Filters.html#OilFiltersThis is NOT your own research.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 23 2008, 02:05 PM
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 19
Joined: 24-August 05
Member No.: 10,634
Status: 
Location: USA
Drives: 2005 Hyundai Sonata L4

|
I've only had trouble with two oil filters in my 25 years driving. Both were Fram.
John :innocent:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 2 2008, 12:52 PM
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 29-May 08
Member No.: 46,064
Status: 
Location: Cincinnati Ohio USA
Drives: 2008 hyundai elantra 2.0

|
What about purolator/pure 1 filters. I have always used them on all of the cars I have owned. I also plan on using them on my new Elantra. The Hyundai dealer- ship is 40 min away and I am not wasting the gas just to go out there for a oil filter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Search
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Get your Hyundai listed in the Garage Today, for FREE, to share with the world what you drive and what toys and modifications you have.

Similar Topics

Similar Topics
|