Sorry Lakes I cannot let this one go. I have no desire to start a flaming war but I do feel that future readers of this thread could finish up with a less than accurate impression from your post. I am wondering if you did not have the time or opportunity to follow the link I provided to K&N's website and read up on their evidence based claims before passing comment.
EDIT: The moderators might like to move this and an edited copy of Lakes reply along with my previous post to a new "K&N filters for the 1.6 HRDi" thread as this does not belong here. :offtopic:
QUOTE(Lakes @ Apr 2 2008, 08:35 PM)
Bun-Yip, the K&N filter is ok, but for what most people here in Australia use a i30 for it's not worth the money or effort. if you really wanted to test your filter to see if it was restrictive, just fit a vacume gauge between the filter and the motor if the K&N was less restrictive the vacume would drop to a lower reading. But problem with the k&N style filter is it needs oil to work, BUT it flows more air without oil, and i've seen them restrict motors when they had too much oil in them and were dirty, i was watching a dyno test on a race motor and they took the K&N off washed it and dryed it and motor made more HP. just telling you as some people just convince themself things like that work magic.
[right][snapback]148491[/snapback][/right]
You do not think that Ausrtalian i30 HRDi drivers would gain from better low rev performance and a bit more acceleration a few extra Horse Power and the chance of a small improvement in fuel consumption for those without a heavy foot all for the price of the K&N replacement panel filter. ( You may notice that as in my previous post I have not suggested a magical improvement) That seems strange to me. I drive in Europe for six months of the year and in urban and rural Australia for the other six months where I do admit to keeping to the sealed roads most of the time. I have done so for several years. I know I will continue to benefit. As to cost well I think that the K&N replacement panel filter for the i30 could cost (US$65.00) somewhere between $70.00 and $80.00 in Oz substantially more than the cost of a single paper filter. AutObarn, Repco and CoventryAuto are listed as stockists so anyone interested could find out.
With appropriate care it should last the life of the car so the fact that there are no filter replacements cuts what the IT people call the Total Cost of Ownership. I guess that some would indeed conclude that they do not want to pay up front for that whilst others might conclude that it is a reasonable price to pay for what they gain. As for effort well forgive me if I have yet to find it difficult to change a standard air filter. Perhaps the i30 would catch me out then I would have a red face.
It occurs to me that if you did not follow the K&N link you might have thought I was referring to an expensive (CAI) High Performance filter kit and not the standard replacement panel filter. Your comments would make a bit more sense to me if that is so but would be misleading for the casual reader of this thread.
Your experience of observing a K&N filter in the hands of someone who, from your description, appeared to me to have been experimenting with non standard use of a filter could lead to a very unfair view of the capability of such filters. You did not make clear if what you observed was a replacement panel filter or one of the high performance CAI filters designed for the kind of task that might have been sought in that situation.
Yes K&N do use a proprietary oil formulation on the cotton gauze for the filtration effect. In fact that is not a problem as you assert but rather the way they are designed to work and provide effective efficient filtration. K&N specifically advise against over oiling so any problems you observed resulting from over oiling can not be laid at K&N's door. There are videos on K&N web site that will show you how easy it is to do it correctly. After extended use by ordinary motorists (50,000 miles or say 80,000Km on mainly sealed roads) they do need to be washed and re-oiled because at that point they can be expected to
begin restricting air flow with the negative effects on performance and fuel consumption you have observed. The drying process should be natural and therefore take some time. ( even in Oz. :) ) If you stood and watched a filter being washed, dried and reused I would suspect that some method to accelerate drying was used which K&N reject as it will damage the filters ability to clean the air stream. Even drying with an unheated hair dryer is discouraged. K&N strive for high standards of filtration (just like paper filters) but with minimum restrictions to air flow using their oiled cotton gauze.
K&N also reject absolutely the possibility of using the filters without the correct amount of the proprietary oil they supply. If you witnessed someone running an engine without oiling the K&N filter you witnessed someone taking extreme risks that I believe would cost them dearly on the road or racing track. I am just glad that neither of us would have to pick up the bill for what could probably be described as stupidity.
Now for those who want to see huge performance gains simply replacing the panel filter will not do the trick as I am sure you already know. Much more sophisticated and costly Cold Air Induction systems are required as part of the package which we would, I think, agree go beyond the needs of "Ordinary Motorists" such as myself. Some may consider the use of a K&N Panel filter something of a quite small performance upgrade based on the published evidence. I can confirm that subjectively from my own experience.
What I am absolutely clear about is that my low rev turbo diesel experience in stop start traffic has improved tremendously since installing my K&N filter. As for high speed motoring well I have not really put it to the test as I tend by an large to observe speed limits although I have earned a few points that say not perfectly. Acceleration also appears improved but then again my Mazda3 1.6D has always shown a decent mid range spurt when required just like the reviews and owners report for the i30. It seems a characteristic of all turbo diesels in my rather limited experience. Definitive testing with an expensive accelerometer would not be of any practical benefit to me. If I ever get access to a suitable bit of deserted straight road I might try to open her up. That is not likely in the UK with our ever increasing numbers of speed cameras. (4000+ when I last heard) As for renting time on a track. Not likely, my old girl (the car not SHMBO) would be laughed off the place.
So in posting my suggestion to give a K&N filter a go in the i30 HRDi I was sharing experience. It is personal and subjective yes but I also provided that web link to help others to check out the evidence before making up their own minds. The inference that I take from your post that there was no objective benefit and that I was deluding myself is not only wrong but offensive. Based on our rather narrow experiences and research we are still entitled to our differing opinions but please make an effort to compose your posts carefully and so show some respect for the experience of others even when you believe we could be wrong.
To me in my carefully researched but definitely non expert opinion it seems clear that all exhaust powered turbos in diesels cannot deliver good effeciency at low revs before the turbo has sufficient gas flow to kick in. Those who are developing Diesel Hybrid cars are using electric motors until they reach reasonable road speeds when the Turbo Diesel can be started and quickly run up to a speed that harnesses diesel efficiency. That combination is yielding good performance with truly mind blowing fuel economy and a delightful drop in pollution as well.
For me anything that boosts current turbo diesel combustion efficiency and hence performance at low revs at what I personally regard as reasonable cost seems worth trying. So I saved my pennies and tried the K&N replacement filter. The improvements observed by myself and those who know my ride are real to us even if you think us deluded. Until someone shows me evidence to the contrary I will also hope that my improved low rev performance is also lowering the normally higher pollution at low revs.
In a couple of weeks time I will be hitting the road for some extensive travelling. I plan to do some serious fuel consumption tests without the aid of any electronic prompts. Just my normal not so expert style. I will be curious as to what results I get over a 1500 -2000Km round the UK trip. I have no reason to think that evidence will do anything but support my opinion.
I would still suggest that a K&N replacement filter would be worth trying in an i30 HRDi. especially for the urban commuter driver. If you only drive on deserted county roads then maybe not. Such a driver would if like me probably squander the benefits on trying to trim journey times which might not be a good idea on some of the country roads in Oz.. Now all I need is for someone to tell us that the specific filter K&N 33-2380 is not imported to Australia and I will have wasted every-ones time. :whistling:
This post has been edited by The Bun-yip: Apr 3 2008, 01:24 PM