![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Register | Home | Forums | Active Topics | Photo Gallery | Garage | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Auto Escrow | Insurance | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#201 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Elon, NC, USA
Drives 2013 Monaco White Elantra Coupe SE
Posts: 999
![]() |
What he's saying is that with the delayed accessory power, if you turn the car off and then realize you forgot to close the roof, you can't just close it, as you can with the windows.
__________________
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#202 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
2013 Elantra GT SE
Posts: 167
![]() |
Quote:
I don't find this an issue though because I'll just flip the key back to the on position without starting the engine to get electrical power again although I guess this might be more of a problem for those with the tech package that has the start-stop button instead. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#203 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Portland OR
2013 Elantra GT A/T -
PZEV, Touch & Go,
Titanium Gray
Posts: 235
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#204 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Columbia, SC, USA
Drives Elantra GT 2013
Posts: 36
![]() |
I'm getting 42 mpg in my Elantra GT basic model automatic, 16 inch rims and Nexen OEM tires. ECO and non-ECO no detectable difference. Highway journey average of repeated runs both ways, near to 60 mph on cruise all the way.
(Hated Hankooks on my trade-in Sonata, hated big wheels, hated in-car Nav prefer free Garmin updates, hated low passenger seat). I like my Elantra GT. |
|
|
|
|
|
#205 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Ontario/Canada
Drives: Elantra GT manual
2009 RAV4 4WD
Posts: 29
![]() |
OK here it goes I got 5.9l per 100km, most of it highway. This is travelling from west TO to Mississauga. About 25km total. Best yet!
Traffic was moderate. The worst I got on a tank from new was 6.9l per 100km. Otherwise I hover at 6.5l per 100km. Petro Canada gas seems to be the best for mileage, Esso not so much. |
|
|
|
|
|
#206 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Greenville, SC
Drives 2013 Elantra GT, w/ 6spd MT in Titanium Gray w/ Style & Tech packages
Posts: 903
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
![]() Current Car: 2013 Elantra GT, 6spd MT, w/ Style & Tech packages Previous Hyundai's: 2011 SE Sonata in Venetian Red; 2006 GLS Sonata, 3.3L in Ebony Black; 2004 Elantra GT in Tidal Wave Blue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#207 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
2013 Elantra GT SE
Posts: 167
![]() |
Quote:
I also gas up at Petro Canada only as I have a combination of cards that gets me up to 10 cents off per litre. I may experiment and try Shell as I've heard Shell typically has some of the best gas in southern Ontario. Quote:
Last edited by Winkle; 11-20-2012 at 09:29 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#208 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Drives Elantra GT GLS GD
Posts: 254
![]() |
My 2001 and 2006 Malibus had sunroofs and you could roll up the windows and close the sunroof with the car off and key out, so long as a door wasn't opened. As soon as a door was opened, the car killed the power to anything that was still on (radio for example), and you would have to turn the car to "ON" (without starting) to operate windows or roof.
OH! and speaking about sunroofs, it's really pissing me off that I can't figure out how to vent my **** panoroof! I either close the sun shade or open it all the way! LMAO! Stupid ass thing! |
|
|
|
|
|
#209 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Elon, NC, USA
Drives 2013 Monaco White Elantra Coupe SE
Posts: 999
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#210 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Bellvue, WA
Elantra GT
Posts: 504
![]() |
The reason sunroofs may have restrictions on how they close and under what conditions is for safety reasons - if a passenger, especially a child, is standing in the opening, they could be seriously injured or killed. The same situation occurs with power windows, but the motors that power these are much less powerful and the risk with windows is mainly having an arm in the opening, not a head or torso.
The systems that are more flexible also tend to be the ones that have sensors or anti-stall circuitry that can detect when there is a potential issue. But these systems cost extra. The whole logic of what is allowed is probably governed by the safety regs in various markets. Some mfgs may just decided to be more conservative to cut down the lawsuits. I'm not justifying the design, just explaining why things are the way they are. - Mark |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|