![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Register | Home | Forums | Active Topics | Photo Gallery | Garage | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Auto Escrow | Insurance | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Drives Hyundai Santa Fe 2007 Limited.
76,000 mls as of March 2013
Posts: 395
![]() |
I consider the CX-9 one of the top SUV out there regarding prompt sprint, handling, ride quality, comfort, room, etc...
I know the LWB would be more appropriate to compare vs Mazda CX-9. In the meantime, has anyone compared them? |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Norfolk, MA
Drives 2006 Sonata & 2013 Santa Fe Sport
Posts: 853
![]() |
Quote:
about the two cars there. The web sites have pictures of exteriors, interiors, colors, dimensions, weights, engines, mpg, features/options, trim lines, warrantys, etc. about each car for you to compare. John. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Drives Hyundai Santa Fe 2007 Limited.
76,000 mls as of March 2013
Posts: 395
![]() |
Quote:
I do a lot of research online and that is why I believe CX-9 is a good SUV, roomy, powerful, good mpg... I have had a change to be in CX-9 as a passenger and I believe that promptness and handling are excellent. I have never been in it for a long trip though. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NW Wisconsin
2013 Santa Fe 2.0T FWD Mineral Gray w/pop. eq. & leather ,
GMC truck
Posts: 658
![]() |
The CX-9 gets 17/19/24. Not what I would call stellar MPG. I looked at it too but went with the Enclave which only has a 1 MPG worse rating but I felt the ride/fit/finish/interior room was better than the CX-9. I do like the exterior styling of the CX-9.
I don't quite understand the hangup about driving performance on a crossover. Who slings these things around corners? Maybe a Porsche Panamera would fit the bill. Oh...and again today I saw a CX-5 driving down the road. As I looked down at it from my truck I heard two words screaming at me as it went by..... "Econo Box". You couldn't give me a CX-5 (well acutally you could but I would drive it over to the Hyundai dealer and trade it for a SF Nothing against your choices Angelo...I'm just ranting a little in general here
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Drives Santa Fe Sport 2.0T
Posts: 7
![]() |
Before I purchased my 2013 SF 2.0T FWD last week, I considered the CX-9GT, CX-5GT, and Kio Sorrento. I test drove each model, as well as the 2.4L vs 2.0T, and settled on my current CUV. I really liked the CX-9, especially in GT trim. Unfortunately, I felt like I was in a boat when sitting inside it. Its huge, and has lots of tech toys in the GT version. But the deciding factor was the poor MPG as compared to the SF. I was in a MB R350, which was also a very long, wide, and large SUV, but doesn't feel that big. The CX-9 looks relatively small on the outside, but felt like a boat IMHO. Just a personal observation. It has really high ratings and positive feedback, but I just felt the SF was a modern design vs the CX-9's more dated, but still very nice design.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: jacksonville, florida usa
Drives 2013 Santa Fe 2.0 T AWD
Posts: 42
![]() |
Quote:
As you might imagine, the parts and pieces to improve on the Sante Fe are pretty scarace now. I expect that situation will loosen up some...there are more folks like me out there than you might realize. At the very least, I'll replace the anti-sway bars, put on some serious high-performance all-weather tires ( maybe different wheels, as well ) and, quite possibly, more capable shock/strut assemblies. There's no doubt that I'll increase turbo boost and go for some engine-management computer re-mapping. The boost controllers are available now and one big outfit is currently working on the re-mapping unit. I'm not out to create a race car.....I've already got that. But I'm darn sure going to take this vehicle to a much higher level of overall performance....which in my case translates into a vehicle that is much more satisfying to drive. I certainly realize that the average guy has no interest in doing what I will do. But perhaps they don't enjoy blasting through the mountain back roads like I do. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Drives Hyundai Santa Fe 2007 Limited.
76,000 mls as of March 2013
Posts: 395
![]() |
I absolutely enjoy the "sling" thing too. No need to push the vehicle to the limit to be able to enjoy the feeling. I do believe that CX-9 has an advantage in that particular area vs all SUV in that category. I wish the LWB will be equal (or better) than CX-9, at that point my decision will be really easy.
Also, I am considering the mods suggested by blackmamba very interesting. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NW Wisconsin
2013 Santa Fe 2.0T FWD Mineral Gray w/pop. eq. & leather ,
GMC truck
Posts: 658
![]() |
Quote:
![]() I had a truck that was slightly lifted, chromed out, and my favorite part...Cat back exhaust system. Loved how it sounded when I was towing our boat. I want to do the same thing to my next truck and the wife asks me when I'm going to grow up - NEVER! Doing what you guys do, I would afraid of scratching the new baby BTW...I do get to fly the jet every other week so that is my "slinging it around" fun.
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|