![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Register | Home | Forums | Active Topics | Photo Gallery | Garage | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Auto Escrow | Insurance | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: westminster co
Sante Fe Sport 2T P&T (wife)
Elantra (daughter)
Saab 9-5 (me)
Posts: 427
![]() |
Hi just picked up a Sport with 2.0L turbo - manual says regular us grade, I think 87 octane rating. So I didn't ask the dealer but assume it's ok to use 85 in Colorado as that's what most cars that run on regular grade use here.
I have a couple of Saabs that can run on regular gas but cannot use 85 rated gas here in CO, it must be 87 or higher, the Saabs use a different type of combustion and knock detection and the engine can produce more power with premium fuel. Just a comment on engine performance - I'd agree with a couple of the reviews I read saying that in certain conditions the engine seems to be uneven with respect to smooth power output and throttle response, but overall it's pretty potent for a 2 liter. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Denver, Colorado
2013 Santa Fe Sport 2.0T AWD
Posts: 39
![]() |
Hi dtech, Small world. I live in Westminster as well. I have been running 87 due to the turbo. The turbo and its nature sort of makes the altitude a moot point (within reason) as the boost stays relatively constant no matter the altitude and thus the cylinder pressures are relatively constant which is definitely not the case on a NA engine. During the winter I think its probably safer to run lower octane due to the lower intake temp reducing the chance of ping. During the summer I would say 87-89 minimum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Brighton, Colorado
Drives Santa Fe '13
Drives Camry '02
Drives Excursion '03
Drives Tige '03
Posts: 33
![]() |
I agree its a small world.......I use 87 Octane and have had no problems so far at 3,500 miles. That extra $1.50 in the added cost is well worth it for the octane.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Magna (SLC) Utah
Drives: 2005 Tiburon SE V6; 2008 Santa Fe Limited AWD
Posts: 573
![]() |
Should be ok with 85. Almost all Hyundais recommend 87 including my Tiburon and Santa Fe, but I've run both on 85 here in Utah with no issues whatsoever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: westminster co
Sante Fe Sport 2T P&T (wife)
Elantra (daughter)
Saab 9-5 (me)
Posts: 427
![]() |
yeah but are your cars turbo charged ? As pointed out the turbo will compensate for less dense air at higher altitudes, different from a na engine so I will feed it 87 as recommended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Magna (SLC) Utah
Drives: 2005 Tiburon SE V6; 2008 Santa Fe Limited AWD
Posts: 573
![]() |
Quote:
In any case, it can't hurt to run higher octane and you'll probably see a little more power too, though it may not be enough to notice. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|